[1][14] Its topic was which "political-economic model provided the great opportunity for human happiness: capitalism or Marxism". Similarly, he's crusading against Take what is perhaps the ultimate rogue state Congo. He wandered between the Paleolithic period and small business management, appearing to know as little about the former as the latter. [16] Due to lack of defence for Marxism, at one point Peterson asked iek why he associates with this ideology and not his philosophical originality, on which iek answered that he is rather a Hegelian and that capitalism has too many antagonisms for long-term peaceful sustainability. The wager of democracy is that we should not give all power to competent experts, because precisely Communists in power who, legitimise this rule, by posing as fake experts. Remove him from his enemies and he is a very poor example of a very old thing the type of writer whom, from Samuel Smiles Self-Help to Eckhart Tolles The Power of Now, have promised simple answers to complex problems. Everything was permitted to them as they perceived themselves as direct instrument of their divinity of historical necessity, as progress towards communism. Some idea make a reappearance, other are newly developed, but it's [1], Around 3,000 people were in Meridian Hall in Toronto for the event. He has published more than three, dozen books, many on the most seminal philosophers of the 19th and 20th centuries. We will probably slide towards apocalypse, he said. Theres nothing to support, proposed Peterson, that a dictatorship of the proletariat would bring about a good outcome, especially considering the lessons of Soviet atrocities in the 20th century. El inters que suscit dicho encuentro descansa en gran parte en el carisma de sus protagonistas que con relativo xito han sabido posicionarse como rostros mediticos y . Really? Christ was justified by the fact of being Gods son not by his competencies or capacities, as Kierkegaard put it Every good student of theology can put things better than Christ. First, of all, the commons of external nature, threatened by pollution, global warming and so on. With no biogenetic technologies, the creation of a new man, in the literal sense of changing human nature, becomes a realistic prospect. He is now a, Professor at the Institute of Sociology and Philosophy at the University of Ljubljana, and the Director of, the Birbeck Institute for the Humanities at the University of London. In the end Peterson-iek was less of a heavyweight boxing match than a WWE Grand Slam. In typical Zizek fashion, So, the term Cultural Marxism plays that of the Jewish plot in anti-Semitism. Privacy Policy. The controversial thinkers debated happiness, capitalism and Marxism in Toronto. his remarks, he starts telling a Slovenian joke, then after the first sentence Is such a change a utopia? And is not the standard, but the true unconstrained consumption in all these creeps here? Regarding to the Peterson-Zizek debate as a whole, yes, I would recommend a listen. And, incidentally Im far from believing in ordinary peoples wisdom. It will be certain only it will be too late, and I am well aware of the temptation to engage in precipitous extrapolations. So, where does Communism, just to conclude, where does Communism enter here? The first one agreed that capitalism possessed inherent contradictions. They were a vague and not particularly informed (by his own admission) reading of The Communist Manifesto. Born in France, Delphine Minoui lived in Tehran for 10 years to understand her grandparents country from the inside. About No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis There are two teams, each consisting of two or three speakers. he event was billed as the debate of the century, The Rumble in the Realm of the Mind, and it did have the feel of a heavyweight boxing match: Jordan Peterson, local boy, against the slapdash Slovenian, Jordan Peterson, Canadian psychology professor and author. The size and scope of his fame registers more or less exactly the loathing for identity politics in the general populace, because it certainly isnt on the quality of his books that his reputation resides. Jordan Peterson itching to take on Slavoj Zizek - 'any time, any place' -", "Slavoj Zizek vs. Jordan Peterson: Marxist gewinnt philosophenduell", "Happiness is watching a brawl between iconoclastic philosophers", "Has Jordan Peterson finally gone too far? What's perhaps most surprising is that Zizek doesn't defend Marxism, which he [19] Harrison Fluss and Sam Miller of Jacobin reported that Peterson made many factual errors, such as misunderstanding the labour theory of value, incorrectly associating Marx broadly with identity politics, and denying the existence of a Marxist philosophy of nature. Copyright 2007-2023 & BIG THINK, BIG THINK PLUS, SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by Freethink Media, Inc. All rights reserved. A good criticism is the one made by Benjamin Studebaker. But there is nonetheless the prospect of a catastrophe here. And, in the new afterword, Bell offers a bracing perspective of contemporary Western societies, revealing the crucial cultural fault lines we face as the 21st century is here. It Was In This Opening Argument That Zizek Effectively Won The Debate To The Extent It Was A Debate At All. How jelly-like bodies help sea creatures survive extreme conditions, How eccentric religions were born in 19th-century America, Land of paradoxes: the inner and outer Iran with Delphine Minoui. Still, that criticism would be salutary for most "communists" They seemed to believe that the academic left, whoever that might be, was some all-powerful cultural force rather than the impotent shrinking collection of irrelevances it is. Another summary of the Peterson/iek debate. They play the victim as much as their enemies. He sees the rejections of some systemic failures of capitalism onto external Related research topic ideas. SLAVOJ IEK: . Good evening and welcome to the Sony Center for Performing Arts. enjoy while Zizek is his tick-ridden idiosyncratic self. Aspen Ideas Festival: From the Barricades of the Culture Wars Transcript Transcripts 2018-09-25T15:05:00-04:00. Hundreds of millions raised from poverty into middle class existence. It can be watched on Jordan Peterson's channel here. The strange bronze artifact perplexed scholars for more than a century, including how it traveled so far from home. Peterson retreats into the integrity of character and Judeo-Christian values as he sees them. The Master and His Emissary: A Conversation with Dr. Iain McGilchrist Transcript . meaningful cause beyond the mere struggle for pleasurable survival. Peterson blamed cultural Marxism for phenomena like the movement to respect gender-neutral pronouns which, in his view, undermines freedom of speech. For more information, please see our His Presidential debate 2020 RECAP What happened in the first election from www.the-sun.com. There was a livestream which people could pay to access that peaked at around 6,000 viewers. And its important to note they do it on behalf of the majority of people. critcial theorists that were widely read. iek asked what Peterson meant by cultural Marxists when postmodern thinkers, like Foucault, werent Marxist at all. Believers call him God the Father. But can God be called a man? In such times of urgency, when we know we have to act but dont know how to act, thinking is needed. should have replied to defend communism. attacking the manifesto isn't perhaps attacking Communism or even Marxism as its Learn how your comment data is processed. They needed enemies, needed combat, because in their solitudes, they had so little to offer.. Along the same lines, one could same that if most of the Nazi claims about Jews they exploit Germans, the seduce German girls were true, which they were not of course, their anti-Semitism would still be a pathological phenomenon, because it ignored the true reason why the Nazis needed anti-Semitism. His comments on one of the greatest feats of human rhetoric were full of . He has not one, sudden cheer, iek shrugs off audience reaction, the University of Ljubljana and a second in psychoanalysis from University, lets hear it for psychoanalysis! If there is no such authority in nature, lobsters may have hierarchy, undoubtedly, but the main guy among them does not have authority in this sense. They didnt understand what is happening to them with military defeat, economic crisis, what they perceived as moral decay, and so on. The same true for how today in Europe the anti-immigrant populists deal with the refugees. In this sense, the image of Donald Trump is also a fetish, the last thing a liberal sees before confronting actual social tensions. So, how to react to this? #philosophytiktok #philosophy #slavojzizek #zizektok #zizek #leftist #based".My formula, maybe you would agree with it, is | my basic dogma is | happiness should be treated as a necessary byproduct | . live commentary is quite funny. [, moderator, president of Ralston College, Doctor Stephen Blackwood. Zizek and Peterson sell books for cash, but cash is just what you need for the real prize: the minds of men. He said things like Marx thought the proletariat was good and the bourgeoisie was evil. So, I dont accept any cheap optimism. At one point, he made a claim that human hierarchies are not determined by power because that would be too unstable a system, and a few in the crowd tittered. El debate Peterson-iek, oficialmente titulado Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism, fue un debate entre el psiclogo canadiense Jordan Peterson (crtico del marxismo) y el filsofo esloveno Slavoj iek ( comunista y hegeliano) sobre la relacin entre marxismo, capitalismo y felicidad. Like I said before, I appreciated immensely that both men seemed pretty much on On april 19th, the debate was held and live streamed. The Hidden Argument in the Zizek/Peterson Debate, From a Competitive Debator | by Timothy Clark | Dialogue & Discourse | Medium 500 Apologies, but something went wrong on our end. ", "Video: Analizirali Smo 'Filozofsku Debatu Stoljea': Pred prepunom dvoranom umove 'ukrstili' iek i Peterson, debata ostavila mlak dojam", "The Jordan PetersonSlavoj iek debate was good for something", "Why Conservatives Get Karl Marx Very, Very Wrong", "What I Learned at the 'Debate' Between Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek", "How Zizek Should Have Replied to Jordan Peterson", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Petersoniek_debate&oldid=1142515270, This page was last edited on 2 March 2023, at 21:02. The pathological element is the husbands need for jealousy as the only way for him to sustain his identity. In Peterson's defense, he did manage to stay much closer to the actual topic of the debate, while Zizek jumped wildly between a dizzying number of subjects. If we compare with Trump with Bernie Sanders, Trump is a post-modern politician at its purist while Sanders is rather an old fashion moralist. I hope reading the debate will help me understand the arguments better. History and diagnosis transcript dr. Peterson discussing "happiness, capitalism vs. Extracto del debate realizado el 19 04 19 entre el psiclogo clnico y crtico cultural jordan peterson y el filsofo y psicoanalista slavoj . matters: meaning, truth, freedom. He makes a big deal out of how he obsessed about communism", though fittingly this drive was much more centralized). It was officially titled Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism, and was drummed up thoroughly. They were making in the usual way, but the cheese got rotten and infected, smelling bad, and they said, oh my god, look, we have our own original French cheese. Peterson had trapped himself into a zero-sum game, Zizek had opened up a. He is a dazzling. Zizek versus Peterson Peterson argues against the postmodern neo-Marxist position held by, in his terms, "the radical left." This position emerged during the '60s but was initiated by the Frankfurt School, which emerged after World War II as a response to the rise of fascism in Europe. The digitalisation of our brains opens up unheard of new possibilities of control. Book deals for political prisoners still in jail. (Chinas success makes a joke out of the whole premise of the debate: the old-fashioned distinction between communism and capitalism.) And we should act in a large scale, collective way. No his conservatism is a post-modern performance, a gigantic ego trip. back to this pre-modern state of affairs. On Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson: Nature, Culture, and the Displacement of Time. If you look closely, you will say that state plays today a more important role precisely in the richest capitalist economics. Boston 24/7 with principal mcafee Read the full transcript. And here applies the same logic to Christ himself. All these antagonisms concern what Marx called commons the shared substance of our social being. Canad. And that was the great irony of the debate: what it comes down to is that they believe they are the victims of a culture of victimization. And what about foreign interventions in Iraq and Syria, or by our proxies like Saudi Arabia in Yemen? But, according to recent estimates, there are now more forest areas in Europe than one hundred years or fifty years ago. there is a link, all the more difficult to follow in the spoken form. What does this mean? I have included my method and aims in a Note at the end of the transcript. This is how refugees are created. EL DEBATE DEL SIGLO: Slavoj iek y Jordan Peterson Disfrut la discusin filosfica entre Michel Onfay y Alain Badiou , pesos pesados del pensamiento alternativo, y qued satisfecho. They are both concerned with more fundamental. Its trademarks universal health care, free education, and so on are continually diminished. In the Nazi vision, their society is an organic whole of harmonic collaboration, so an external intruder is needed to account for divisions and antagonisms. So, a pessimist conclusion, what will happen? Before you say, its a utopia, I will tell you just think about in what way the market already functions today. This is NOT a satire/meme sub. It felt like that. [Scattered Audience applause and cheers]Both Doctor iek and Peterson transcend their titles, their disciplines, and the academy, just as this debatewe hopewill transcend purely economic questions by situating those in the frame Todays China combines these two features in its extreme form strong, totalitarian state, state-wide capitalist dynamics. They returned to their natural subject: who is the enemy? Refresh the. [12][13], The debate was divided into two thirty-minute introductions from each participant, followed by shorter ten-minute responses and time at the end for additional comments and answers to questions posed by the moderator, Stephen J. So, here I think I know its provocative to call this a plea for communism, I do it a little bit to provoke things but what is needed is nonetheless in all these fears I claim ecology, digital control, unity of the world a capitalist market which does great things, I admit it, has to be somehow limited, regulated and so on. It was in this opening argument that Zizek effectively won the debate to the extent it was a debate at all. Competencies for what? Web november 12, 2022 advertisement the nigerian factcheckers . Look at Bernie Sanders program. it, or in the effort to actualise our inner potentials. what the debate ended up being. But these two towering figures of different disciplines and domains share more than a. commitment to thinking itself. Please feel free to correct this document. In that part of the discussion, you say that you calling yourself a Communist is a bit of a provocation . Peterson's more practically-oriented style also made his arguments a bit more approachable to non-academics.